The Hard Sell Film Awards 2007

I’ve decided to do things a bit different this year and instead of a Top Ten I’m going to do some facetious awards instead; after all, if the writer’s strike continues this year’s Oscars aren’t going to be very fun, so why not?

Again, the usual caveats are that this is all personal opinion and people may or may not agree with any of it. Let’s start nice and go on from there…

  • Most Entertaining Big Budget Action Movie: The Bourne Ultimatum

Stupidly gives away the most entertaining stunt of Bourne’s in the trailer, but even then I don’t think a better rollercoaster ride through the dark side of the War On Terror could be managed. Paul Greengrass’s flashy style really does work for these movies, too; giving it a claustrophobic, realistic feel. Also, it’s clever, and proud to be so, you’ve got to admire that in Hollywood nowadays.

  • Most Unexpectedly Enjoyable Franchise Juggernaut: The Golden Compass

It should have been called Northern Lights (even the credits say “Adapted from the novel ‘Northern Lights'”), and it ends way too early, but their Lyra’s not too terrible, the styling’s pretty neat although a bit too shiny, they didn’t screw up the religion too badly and Nicole Kidman has been unfairly maligned by a lot of people. It’s OK, and it deserved much better; not least from New Line.

  • The Princess Bride Award for the Film that should have Done Much Better at the Box Office: Stardust

Stardust actually made about as much at the box office over here as it did in the States, despite the horrendous marketing campaign that sunk it over there simply being copied; mainly because word of mouth was allowed to spread before it was taken out of the cinemas. The marketing campaign was dreadful: it made the film look like a poor Disney Channel original, taking everything completely out of context and making it look treacly, something which the film most definitely is not.

Stardust is a fantastic film, Ricky Gervais cameo aside, with great humour and verve; owing a lot to the film which this award is named after, which also sank at the box office and was rescued by video. Hopefully Stardust will have the same lasting memory.

  • Most Unexpectedly Enjoyable Sequel: Die Hard 4.0
  • Better Than It Should Have Been: Die Hard 4.0

Yes, it had computer hacking so amazingly unrealistic it made The Net look like an everyday tale of script kiddies everywhere. Yes, it has been toned down severely for PG-13. Yes, it does have some massive plot holes. Yes, it thinks that firing a car into a helicopter is a neat stunt. But you know what? It is. Kevin Smith making a cameo as the traditional basement nerd? Neat! An over-ambitious, completely impossible threat from a bunch of nerds with Alienwares? Hilarious! John McClane? Still the best traditional action hero around, by far. Len Wiseman’s direction? Not awful. Very much my guilty pleasure of the year.

  • The Patrick Bateman Award for the Slimiest Utter Bastard in a Major Motion Picture: David Strathairn for The Bourne Ultimatum

No contest here really – the brilliant Strathairn (last seen as Edward R. Murrow in Good Night and Good Luck) wins this most coveted of screen awards for the role of Noah Vosen, a CIA desk jockey who panics and uses murder as a first resort when the shit hits the fan, thus attracting the attention of one Jason Bourne. “It ends when we’ve won” indeed.

  • Best Performance by a Child Actor: Thomas Turgoose, This Is England

Shane Meadows is the British film industry’s best working director, and his method of finding actors from local youth groups has turned out some startling results; none more in this, where his local ex-troublemaker find Thomas Turgoose is entirely believably brought under the wing of a group of skinheads and eventually is forced to reconsider all his allegiances. Truly astonishing work in an astonishing film.

  • Best Performance Full Stop: Sam Riley, Control
  • Best Ensemble Cast: Control
  • Best Use of Music in a Motion Picture: Control
  • Best Film I’ve Seen This Year: Control

As you may be aware, I am a bit of a Joy Division fan so this might be a little skewed, but everything is right with Control. The use of black and white, Anton Corbijn’s framing and imagery, Sam Riley’s assured and uncompromising performance as the often difficult to like Ian Curtis, the way it all works with the music, the acting talent used for pretty much everyone, the fact that Corbijn managed to do it all on the cheap… Remarkable.

  • Best Ignored Performance of the Year: Michelle Pfeiffer, Stardust

An extraordinarily varied role, Michelle Pfeiffer nails it and gives one of the most confident and fearsome performances that no-one noticed. It’s great to have her back.

  • The David Lynch Award for Weird, Yet Good: I’m a Cyborg, But I’m OK!

The new movie from Park Chan-Wook, the man who gave us Oldboy and Sympathy for Mr. Vengeance – and nothing whatsoever like either.

  • The Matrix Reloaded Award for a Sequel that Just Lost Its Way: Pirates of the Caribbean: At World’s End

I actually liked Dead Man’s Chest on a “not as good as the first one” level and as such the opening of At World’s End was a bitter disappointment – nothing whatsoever of interest happens in the first hour of the film and it’s a really hard slog to get to anything interesting, the nadir being the poorly thought out sequence with multiple Jack Sparrows that irritatingly recurs throughout the film.

Once you get past that stuff there’s some interesting double-dealing and battle sequences, but it’s really hard getting there – and as such the Matrix sequels are an entirely correct comparison.

(And what was with the opening hanging sequence anyway? It’s completely out of tone.)

  • The Showgirls Award For Sex Scenes That Leave The Least To The Imagination: 300

It starts off like your traditional soft-focus movie sex scene, then it gets harder, and then it cuts back to reveal Gerard Butler and Lena Headey going at it doggy style. It was practically the sex scene from Team America, only with less bodily fluids. And that’s not even mentioning the rape scene later on…

Oddly enough, 300 would later feature the “freedom isn’t free” line from that very same movie, only said entirely seriously by our next winner…

  • Worst Actress: Lena Headey, 300
  • Worst Actor: David Wenham, 300
  • Worst Ensemble Cast: 300
  • Director who should Never Ever Ever Use A Green Screen Again: Zach Snyder, 300
  • Worst Acting Performance from a Normally Decent Actor in a Decent Movie: John Malkovich, Beowulf

Why is it that some people just can’t work in front of a green screen? Headey was far the worst offender of these: she is truly horrible in 300 and brings the entire movie crashing down around her. She’s just wrong; but the thing is, practically everyone else in the movie is too, only slightly less so. Wenham’s voiceover in particular has a massive dose of Braveheart syndrome, and the bits where he’s acting are just as grating – but he was OK as Faramir in Lord of the Rings and so we can only assume he was taken down by the green screen. The same applies to the worst casualty here John Malkovich – almost as bad in Beowulf as he was in Eragon, except here he’s actually killing a decent movie.

Headey is the new Sarah Connor in the Terminator TV series. Hopefully she’ll be better in front of a real camera with a director whose name isn’t Zach Snyder. As you might tell, I am not looking forward to Watchmen.

  • Most Overrated Supposed Geek Movie Which Geeks Unaccountably Seem Forced To Continually Praise: Transformers

Come on, it’s directed by Michael Bay, the man who gave us Armageddon and Pearl Harbor. It’s not for us, it’s for morons. Why do the Ain’t It Cool crowd still think it was manna from heaven? It really wasn’t, it just threw out occasional crumbs to Transformers fans whilst fitting in Bay’s military obsession and a traditional and highly clichéd Government Conspiracy plotline.

Also, I’m not done with this movie, as I bash something I cut out the original review for space reasons with the much coveted

  • Mandingo Award for Gratuitous Xenophobia in the Pursuit of Cheap Laughs: Transformers

Whose bright idea was the Indian call centre scene? Who thought it would be a great idea to have the Big Military Hero bash one of his comrades for speaking Spanish? And who decided to have one of the robots take on the Black Sidekick who Sacrifices Himself For The Crew stereotype? Not only are these scenes tasteless and borderline racist, but the call centre scene doesn’t even make narrative sense in any way whatsoever.  It feels tacked on, sordid, and very much worthy of the trophy.

  • The Rob Halford Award for Manly Men doing Manly Things to Each Other: 300

I suspect that in any other year, 300 would have walked the previous category, but Michael Bay just had to come along and put his foot in. Instead, it can console itself with this, which it greatly deserves.

  • The “Bit With Ricky Gervais In” Award for the Worst Moment in an Otherwise Decent Movie: The bit with Ricky Gervais in Stardust.
  • also considered: The bit with Ricky Gervais in For Your Consideration.
  • also considered: The bit with Ricky Gervais in Night at the Museum (although that movie’s poor even without him).
  • also considered: The bit where the Ordinary Boys show up as the Gryffindor common-room Big Tune in Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix

Ricky is of course a serial offender for movie-killing and he almost does it to the otherwise fantastic Stardust. His cameo with Robert de Niro, otherwise a surprisingly competent comedy performer, almost kills the film stone dead; the only saviour is that both of the film’s villains have their various ways with him afterwards.

Ricky’s performance at the Diana memorial concert, whilst not qualifying for this particular awards night, would be a decent contender for the year’s “Jump The Shark, Hit The Floor” award.

  • Worst Franchise Movie: Saw IV

The world really did not need this movie.

So that’s it, only one final envelope left to go and then we’re done. It’s rather special…

  • Jon Peters Award for Worst Idea of the Year: Harvey Weinstein, Bob Weinstein, Matthew Stern, Rob Zombie, Malek Akkad and everyone else involved, peripherally or otherwise, with Rob Zombie’s Halloween

First, there is Rob Zombie, the man who brought us House of 1000 Corpses and The Devil’s Rejects, a man fond of nothing more than tit shots, incest and gore. Then there is the idea of remaking Halloween, John Carpenter’s brilliant, restrained, effective and unimprovable slasher. Then the producers responsible for the series came up with the idea of putting the two together…

Worthy winner, I think. The movie is even worse than the idea, which is somewhat shocking; more shocking, in fact, than anything in the movie which tries to be.

There we go, the awards are done. I’d just like to thank wordpress.com for blog hosting, my family, my friends, my agent, my… [fades to black]

The horror, the horror

Summary: I look at certain slightly connected horror films on near-enough current release – Rob Zombie’s Halloween, Grind House and Black Sheep – and discuss where Hollywood has lost its way and how it could fix it. I also give reasons why I don’t like Rob Zombie’s Halloween. A lot of them. Very few spoilers – I try to keep it to a low amount – but the article is very long, and so there’s a page break coming up now.

Continue reading “The horror, the horror”

Mini-Reviews #1: The Simpsons, Die Hard

First in a new series of mini-reviews for films and other media I don’t feel like an extended article for right now.

  • The Simpsons Movie (2007, US, Fox). It’s an extended version of one of the Springfield-heads-for-over-the-top-disaster episodes from the series, but it’s nowhere near as good as the finest examples of this (Marge vs. the Monorail, Bart’s Comet and so on). And Spider-Pig is NOT FUNNY.Despite this, it’s entertaining; it’s modern-Simpsons quality rather than classic-series or Futurama quality, however, so don’t go in expecting it to be a modern classic or anything. Interesting low-level satire aimed at the New Orleans disaster too.
  • Die Hard 4.0 (2007, US, Fox). Bunch of unbelievable superhackers 0wn the East Coast of America and John McClane has to stop them, which he does explosively. Completely technically inaccurate, physically inaccurate and has some incredibly laughable plot holes. Still better than Die Hard with a Vengeance despite the obvious toning-down for PG-13 and has some pretty good stunts. Place in guilty pleasures category.

Coming next: Edinburgh International Film Festival 2007, 15 August – 26 August. I am missing most of the big names because I couldn’t buy tickets in time; so instead I’m seeing a lot of oddball indie comedy and horror. My first film’s on Friday (or tomorrow if I can wangle a return) and mini- or fuller reviews will accompany each of them.

“Transformers”: Less than meets the eye

Sorry. I couldn’t resist that title, obvious though it is, because Michael Bay’s Transformers is comfortably the most shallow movie I’ve seen for a long time. It really is a most puzzling film – starting with exactly why it exists – and I’m not entirely sure I can figure it out entirely. I’m going to take a good try at it, though, so expect a SPOILER WARNING (although what exactly counts as a spoiler that wasn’t already shown in the trailers I’m not currently aware) for beyond the jump.

Read review…

First look: Die Hard 4.0, or “Live Free Or Die Hard”

The first ten minutes have now been released in low-quality, buffery WMV on the website of Yahoo! Japan, and it looks like it’s got about as accurate a take on the power of a group of computer blackhats as Hackers and The Net, and with worse technobabble. This is 2007, for crying out loud…

It doesn’t just look worse than Die Hard with a Vengeance, it looks worse than Speed 2. It looks to be about on the same level as Firewall. That’s not good.

Of course, we can’t judge the full movie on the first ten minutes, but this doesn’t look hopeful at all; and it’s a shame, because I think Bruce and John McClane deserve better than Len Wiseman, a PG-13 rating and a computer-hacker plotline that was outdated when Mitnick got arrested. Nice work, guys.

[via Film Ick.]

This isn’t really Sparta: a close look at “300”

300” is a film about, well, 300 Spartans fighting the famous “battle” of Thermopylaye, or maybe it’s about any number of different subtextual things which will probably be argued about for years. It’s a very odd, somewhat interesting curiosity of a film. It’s not very good, and yet it’s somehow memorable. Why this is, unfortunately, requires a spoiler warning and a page break. I wish it wasn’t so, but it is.
Continue reading “This isn’t really Sparta: a close look at “300””

Terry Gilliam gets screwed over again

The guy just can’t get a break, can he? He really has suffered too much for his art over the years – the Brazil experience (which ended up resembling something straight out of the film itself) would probably have finished off a lesser director, and then when you take into account the lack of funding he’s experienced when compared to people like Brett Ratner or Tim Story or Len Wiseman or Paul WS Anderson who seem to have cash just thrown at them I wonder exactly how he keeps going. Hell, even Uwe Boll seems to get more funding than TG does nowadays, and everyone agrees his movies suck.

Come on, pan-and-scanning a film to 16:9 is simply unacceptable, especially when it’s a film by a director like Terry Gilliam who knows exactly what he wants in his frame and where (and where to use an idiosyncratic aspect ratio). I thought we’d got past the days of pan and scan by now, in this age of DVD as standard and HD on the horizon, but it seems that it lingers in the independent sector. The one bright spot here, oddly, is that this issue appears to affect only the US and some Canadian editions – the British edition has the Gilliam-approved master, and apparently so does at least one of the available R3s, so American TG fans are now working out where they can buy a multiregion player. Welcome to our world.

“Idiocracy”: Truth? Justice? Absolutely no way.

There’s no corporate manoeuvre from the last year more depressing than that given by 20th Century Fox to Mike Judge’s future-imperfect comedy Idiocracy.

Fox has had the complete film for years – the copyright date in the end credits is 2005, and principal photography was actually 2003/4 – but has consistently refused to release it, eventually relenting late last year and allowing it to be seen on 150 screens in the US with no promotion whatsoever, simply to fulfil the contract demanding a cinematic release. Apparently they blame this on poor focus groups, this from the studio that gave us without comment Big Momma’s House 2, and nothing whatsoever to do with the corporate criticism (including of Fox News itself) contained within. There has been no foreign release, although there is a suggestion on IMDB’s UK website that it’s going to go straight to DVD. You can currently buy the Region 1 release through it.

This film is just too good for that. Curious about it from the stories I’d seen from the States, and with no way I could have seen it legally, I discovered it on a “certain” website and decided to give it a go. The version “out there” appears to be sourced from the Region 1 DVD, which I’d highly recommend buying. I’m certainly going to; DVD buying brought back Family Guy, is about to bring back Futurama, and made Judge’s previous Office Space (also badly treated theatrically) into a cult classic. The fact that these are all Fox produced shows… well, something.

Review follows (with MILD SPOILER WARNING) after the break.

Continue reading ““Idiocracy”: Truth? Justice? Absolutely no way.”

Hot Fuzz: an advance preview

It’s really good. Go see it.

Full review coming up after the in progress Notes on a Scandal one, along with a little rant about the Brit awards. In the meantime, however, I have a few things to do and a very dodgy Net connection (and if Virgin don’t get their act together soon it’s time to remind them that I can get Be Unlimited and call their bluff.)

Oscar nominations are out.

  • Dreamgirls not being nominated for Best Picture is very surprising, I must say, along with The Departed and Little Miss Sunshine getting in there. I predict Letters from Iwo Jima.
  • Penelope Cruz gets a nomination for Volver. Unfortunately for her, this is Helen Mirren’s year in that category; if Meryl Streep gets it it will be a serious 1977-scale Oscar miscarriage.
  • As expected, Martin Scorcese is on track to lose his fifth Oscar in the Best Director category (although with the number of noms The Departed has gained, who knows?) The winner will probably be Eastwood, Inarittu or Greengrass, though.
  • Still on the subject of The Departed, Mark Wahlberg’s Supporting Actor nomination is somewhat of a surprise considering how little screen time he actually had (most of it spent swearing entertainingly and, admittedly, memorably.) If you wanted to nominate a BSA from the film, Martin Sheen or even Jack Nicholson would have been a better bet. Eddie Murphy will probably take the category anyway.
  • Best Foreign Language Film: Pan’s Labyrinth. Say it.
  • Children of Men gets nominated for best cinematography and editing, both of which it deserves completely; and best screenplay, which is wide open (Borat is nominated here, which is a surprise.)
  • An Inconvenient Truth is nominated for Best Documentary, which is intriguing.
  • Honorary Oscar for Ennio Morricone. At last!

So an intriguing mixed bunch this year, no one film dominating. Interesting night ahead, I think.